I. The Craft of Academic Writing: Why It’s More Than Just Words
Some people think writing an essay is just about dumping information on a page, hitting the word count, and submitting it. But real academic writing—good writing—is much more than that. It’s an art. A craft. A skill that requires structure, flow, and argumentation. It’s about persuasion, style, and engagement.
This is exactly why AI-generated essays will always be garbage. AI doesn’t write—it predicts text based on statistical patterns, not understanding or intent. While an AI-generated essay might look polished on the surface, it quickly falls apart under scrutiny. It lacks coherence, depth, and originality—all things a skilled ghostwriter provides effortlessly.
If writing were just about arranging words, AI might stand a chance. But it’s not. Academic writing is about shaping ideas, constructing compelling arguments, and leading the reader through a logical progression of thought. That’s something AI will never master.
1. The Difference Between AI Writing and Human Craftsmanship
A good ghostwriter doesn’t just string words together—they carefully construct an argument, build logical flow, and adapt to the nuances of academic writing. AI, by contrast, lacks intention. It doesn’t think, it doesn’t reason, and it doesn’t write with purpose.
Let’s compare the difference between AI-generated writing and human writing in a simple example:
AI-Generated Response on the Causes of the French Revolution:
“The French Revolution happened for many reasons. Some of these include economic hardship, political unrest, and social inequality. Many historians argue that the revolution was inevitable, while others believe it could have been prevented. Overall, the causes of the French Revolution are complex and varied.”
Ghostwriter Response on the Causes of the French Revolution:
“The French Revolution was driven by three interwoven factors: economic collapse, social unrest, and the erosion of monarchical legitimacy. France’s financial crisis, exacerbated by costly wars and a failing taxation system, fueled widespread dissatisfaction among the Third Estate. Simultaneously, Enlightenment ideals encouraged the masses to question hereditary privilege and demand representative governance. Ultimately, the monarchy’s inability to address these pressures led to a revolutionary uprising that reshaped France’s political landscape.”
The difference is obvious.
- AI’s writing is generic, repetitive, and noncommittal—it dumps information without making an argument.
- A ghostwriter crafts a coherent, engaging, and structured response that presents a clear thesis.
2. AI Writing Lacks Intent, Purpose, and Direction
One of the biggest problems with AI-generated writing is that it doesn’t know what it’s saying. It generates words based on patterns, not meaning. That means:
- AI doesn’t build an argument—it simply presents information in a neutral, unfocused way.
- AI doesn’t anticipate reader expectations—it doesn’t adjust tone, depth, or style to fit academic requirements.
- AI doesn’t engage with ideas critically—it merely regurgitates what has already been written elsewhere.
This is why AI-generated essays often feel empty. The sentences make sense, but there’s no real intellectual engagement behind them. Professors can tell immediately when an essay lacks a human touch—because it lacks depth, purpose, and logical progression.
3. Why Ghostwriting is a Craft, Not a Factory Process
Academic ghostwriting isn’t automated—it’s a tailored process that requires adapting to specific prompts, grading rubrics, and professor expectations. No two essays are alike. AI, on the other hand, produces generic, formulaic text that completely ignores the nuances of academic assignments.
- A ghostwriter considers the prompt carefully.
- What is the professor looking for? What are the key themes? What historical context is relevant?
- A ghostwriter structures the essay strategically.
- What’s the strongest thesis? How should the argument be built? What sources should be used?
- A ghostwriter adapts to the student’s voice and academic level.
- A first-year history essay shouldn’t sound like a PhD dissertation—and a ghostwriter knows how to adjust accordingly.
The Bottom Line: AI Will Never Match the Craft of a Skilled Writer
Ghostwriting is an art because writing is an art. It’s about clarity, flow, argumentation, and persuasion—things AI-generated text fundamentally lacks. A ghostwriter constructs ideas with purpose, intent, and structure—AI simply guesses what words should come next.
That’s why AI-generated essays will always be garbage—and why ghostwriting isn’t just surviving, but thriving.
II. AI vs. Structure: Why Chatbots Write Like Garbage
One of the biggest giveaways of an AI-generated essay is its complete lack of structure. Good academic writing isn’t just a collection of sentences—it follows a clear, logical progression where each idea builds upon the last. Every paragraph has a purpose, every argument flows into the next, and the entire essay is carefully crafted to lead the reader toward a strong, persuasive conclusion.
AI-generated essays, on the other hand? They’re a mess.
AI doesn’t understand how arguments are structured—it just spits out words in a way that looks like an essay, but doesn’t actually function as one. It might follow a basic introduction-body-conclusion format, but within that, its writing is often disjointed, repetitive, and directionless.
Let’s break down why AI writing completely fails at structure and why ghostwriters will always be superior.
1. A Good Essay Has Logical Flow—AI Essays Don’t
A strong essay follows a deliberate order of ideas, ensuring that the reader moves logically from one point to the next. Each section sets up the next, building toward a powerful argument.
Ghostwriters think through this process strategically—AI does not.
Here’s what a well-structured human-written argument looks like:
✅ Thesis Statement: “The French Revolution was driven primarily by economic collapse, which fueled social unrest and political upheaval.”
✅ Body Paragraph 1: Explains how France’s national debt and taxation policies created economic instability.
✅ Body Paragraph 2: Connects economic struggles to rising discontent among the Third Estate.
✅ Body Paragraph 3: Demonstrates how economic turmoil led to revolutionary political demands.
✅ Conclusion: Summarizes the progression of ideas, reinforcing how economics was the central cause.
Now, here’s how AI tends to structure an essay:
❌ Introduction: “The French Revolution had many causes, including economic struggles, political issues, and social factors.”
❌ Body Paragraph 1: Discusses the monarchy (without tying it to the argument).
❌ Body Paragraph 2: Randomly shifts to Enlightenment ideas (without linking them to economics).
❌ Body Paragraph 3: Mentions economic struggles but without showing how they connect to the revolution.
❌ Conclusion: Weak, generic summary that fails to bring the argument together.
AI jumps between ideas without clear transitions. Instead of presenting a coherent argument, it lists information randomly, hoping it sounds convincing.
Professors immediately notice when an essay lacks clear structure.
2. AI-Generated Essays Are Formulaic and Repetitive
One of the easiest ways to spot AI writing is its predictable, repetitive structure. Because AI doesn’t actually understand what it’s saying, it relies on pre-programmed sentence patterns that make every paragraph feel the same.
-
AI repeats the same ideas over and over in slightly different wording.
- Example:
- “The French Revolution had many causes, including economic problems, political struggles, and social discontent.”
- “There were many different factors that led to the French Revolution, such as economic instability, government issues, and unrest among the people.”
- Example:
-
AI overuses generic transition phrases.
- Example:
- “It is important to note that…”
- “This shows that…”
- “Another example of this is…”
- Example:
-
AI fails to develop arguments—it just regurgitates facts.
- Instead of expanding on ideas, AI keeps restating the same broad points in slightly different ways, hoping to meet a word count.
A ghostwriter, on the other hand, ensures that each sentence adds something new to the argument—nothing is filler, and everything builds toward a compelling conclusion.
3. AI Struggles With Transitions and Paragraph Organization
A well-structured essay guides the reader smoothly from one point to the next. Every paragraph has a clear topic sentence, and transitions connect ideas logically.
AI fails at this because it doesn’t understand relationships between ideas.
Example of an AI-generated paragraph transition:
“The French Revolution was caused by economic struggles. Additionally, political issues were important. Many people also experienced social hardship. This is why the revolution happened.”
Notice how none of these sentences actually connect? AI doesn’t explain how one idea leads to the next, making its writing feel like a collection of random facts rather than a structured argument.
A ghostwriter, however, would write a smooth transition like this:
“France’s worsening economic conditions didn’t just affect the lower classes—they fueled widespread resentment toward the monarchy. As financial instability worsened, political tensions increased, pushing the Third Estate to demand revolutionary change.”
That’s the difference between intelligent structuring and AI-generated gibberish.
4. AI Lacks Nuance—Ghostwriters Adapt to Academic Expectations
Academic writing isn’t just about presenting information—it’s about adapting structure and style to the assignment. AI-generated essays feel mechanical and generic, while ghostwriters tailor their work to match the level and requirements of the course.
For example:
- A first-year student’s essay should be clear and straightforward, without overly complex analysis.
- A graduate-level paper should engage with advanced theories, detailed citations, and deep critical thinking.
AI fails at adjusting tone, style, and depth—it writes every essay the same way, making its work instantly recognizable as fake.
Ghostwriters, on the other hand, know how to match writing to the student’s academic level, ensuring the essay feels authentic and passes as the student’s own work.
The Bottom Line: AI Writing is Structurally Useless Because of Specification Gaming
A well-structured essay is thoughtful, logical, and persuasive—AI-generated writing is scattered, repetitive, and directionless. Professors can immediately spot AI-generated work because it lacks flow, coherence, and meaningful transitions.
AI writing isn’t structured—it’s scrambled.
Ghostwriters, on the other hand, don’t just put words on a page—they build arguments, craft smooth transitions, and adapt writing to match academic expectations.
That’s why AI-generated essays will always be garbage—and why ghostwriting isn’t just surviving, but thriving.
III. The Argumentation Problem: AI Can’t Defend a Point
One of the most fundamental aspects of academic writing is argumentation—the ability to take a stance, support it with evidence, and engage with counterarguments. In humanities disciplines like philosophy, history, and political science, students aren’t just expected to list facts; they must analyze, interpret, and persuade.
This is exactly where AI completely collapses.
AI doesn’t argue—it summarizes. AI doesn’t persuade—it lists information without taking a real position. AI doesn’t engage with counterarguments—it avoids controversy altogether.
That’s why AI-generated essays always sound weak, noncommittal, and directionless. Professors can instantly recognize them because real academic writing requires bold, well-supported arguments—something AI fundamentally cannot produce.
1. AI-Generated Essays Are Neutral and Weak
One of the biggest giveaways of an AI-written essay is its complete lack of conviction. When an essay asks a student to take a position—whether on ethics, politics, or history—AI will hedge its bets and refuse to commit to an argument.
For example, let’s say the essay prompt asks:
“Was the French Revolution primarily caused by economic collapse or political instability?”
Here’s how AI responds:
“The French Revolution was influenced by multiple factors, including economic struggles and political instability. Some historians argue that financial issues were the most significant cause, while others believe political factors played a greater role. Ultimately, the causes of the French Revolution are complex and cannot be reduced to a single reason.”
Translation? This says absolutely nothing.
Now, here’s how a ghostwriter would respond:
“While the French Revolution was shaped by various forces, economic collapse was the primary catalyst for revolutionary upheaval. France’s spiraling national debt, exacerbated by excessive spending and an inefficient tax system, led to mass discontent, making political reform inevitable. Without economic collapse, public dissatisfaction might never have reached a tipping point, proving that financial instability was the most critical factor in triggering the revolution.”
See the difference?
✅ The ghostwritten essay takes a position and defends it.
❌ The AI-generated essay is vague and noncommittal.
AI never fully commits to an argument, making its writing feel weak, indecisive, and unconvincing.
2. AI Doesn’t Engage With Counterarguments
A strong academic essay doesn’t just present one argument—it acknowledges and refutes opposing perspectives. This is a key requirement in university writing, but AI fails miserably at it.
Let’s say the prompt asks:
“Is utilitarianism a stronger ethical framework than deontology?”
A well-structured human essay would:
✅ Present the case for utilitarianism (its focus on outcomes and maximizing happiness).
✅ Address Kantian deontology as a competing perspective.
✅ Explain why deontology is flawed (e.g., its rigid rules lead to moral dilemmas).
✅ Conclude with a clear defense of utilitarianism, having successfully refuted the counterargument.
AI, on the other hand, would avoid real engagement and write something like this:
“Utilitarianism and deontology are two important ethical frameworks. Some argue that utilitarianism is better because it focuses on consequences, while others believe deontology is better because it emphasizes duty. Both perspectives have strengths and weaknesses, and the debate between them is ongoing.”
This is not an argument.
AI doesn’t understand how to challenge opposing views—it just presents both sides neutrally without actually analyzing them. Ghostwriters, on the other hand, know how to engage critically, anticipate objections, and systematically dismantle counterarguments.
3. AI Writing is Full of Hedging and Weasel Words
Another major red flag of AI-generated essays is their reliance on hedging language—words and phrases that soften arguments to the point of meaninglessness.
AI loves to use phrases like:
❌ “Some people say that…”
❌ “It is possible that…”
❌ “There are many perspectives on this issue…”
❌ “This is a complex debate with no clear answer…”
These phrases are fluff. They weaken the argument instead of strengthening it.
A real academic essay, written by a skilled ghostwriter, makes clear, strong claims and supports them with concrete evidence. AI-generated writing, by contrast, dances around the topic without making real assertions.
4. AI Essays Lack Logical Progression in Argumentation
A well-argued essay isn’t just about making a claim—it’s about logically proving that claim step by step. AI completely fails at this because it doesn’t think logically—it just strings sentences together.
Here’s how a strong human-written argument builds logically:
✅ Claim: “Economic collapse was the main cause of the French Revolution.”
✅ Evidence: France’s taxation system disproportionately burdened the poor, leading to mass discontent.
✅ Counterargument: Some argue that political factors were more important, but economic failure created the conditions for political unrest.
✅ Conclusion: Without financial instability, the revolution might not have happened, proving economic collapse was the primary cause.
Now, here’s what AI does:
❌ Claim: “There were many causes of the French Revolution.”
❌ Evidence: “Economic struggles were one factor.”
❌ Counterargument: “Political instability was also a factor.”
❌ Conclusion: “In the end, the French Revolution was caused by multiple things.”
This is not argumentation—this is list-making.
AI doesn’t connect ideas. It presents points without linking them, making its writing feel random, unfocused, and weak.
Ghostwriters, however, know how to construct an argument step by step, ensuring every paragraph builds toward a strong, persuasive conclusion.
The Bottom Line: AI is Incapable of Real Argumentation
AI-generated essays fail at argumentation because they:
❌ Don’t take a real stance—they hedge and avoid commitment.
❌ Don’t engage with counterarguments—they just list both sides without analysis.
❌ Rely on weak, generic phrasing—instead of making strong, persuasive claims.
❌ Lack logical progression—ideas are scattered instead of building toward a clear argument.
Professors can instantly recognize AI writing because it feels weak, disorganized, and noncommittal.
A strong academic essay requires bold claims, logical reasoning, and well-supported arguments—things that AI will never be able to produce.
That’s why AI-generated essays will always be garbage—and why ghostwriters, who understand the art of argumentation, will always win.
IV. Research and Citations: AI’s Biggest Flaw
If there’s one thing that instantly exposes an AI-generated essay, it’s fake or inaccurate citations. Academic writing isn’t just about making claims—it’s about backing those claims with credible sources. Professors don’t just want opinions; they want evidence, citations, and engagement with real scholarly work.
AI, however, doesn’t actually understand research—it just makes things up.
From fabricated sources to incorrect citations, AI-generated essays are a disaster when it comes to research. Ghostwriters, on the other hand, know how to find, evaluate, and properly cite real academic sources, ensuring essays meet university standards.
Here’s why AI fails at research—and why ghostwriters remain irreplaceable.
1. AI Fabricates Sources Out of Thin Air because AI Alignment is a myth.
One of the most infamous AI failures in academic writing is its tendency to generate fake citations. Since AI doesn’t actually access real books or journal articles, it simply hallucinates sources that sound plausible—but don’t actually exist.
For example, ask an AI chatbot for sources on postcolonial theory in African literature, and it might generate:
❌ “Mbembe, A. (2017). Decolonial Thought in African Literature. Oxford University Press.”
Looks real, right? It’s completely fake.
Professors are catching students submitting AI-written essays with citations that don’t exist, leading to academic misconduct investigations.
Ghostwriters, on the other hand, use real sources.
✅ They search for peer-reviewed journals, academic books, and credible websites.
✅ They correctly cite sources using APA, MLA, Chicago, or Harvard style.
✅ They ensure all citations are verifiable and aligned with the student’s field of study.
If a professor Google searches an AI citation, they immediately know it’s fake—but a ghostwritten paper? It holds up under scrutiny.
2. AI Misuses and Misinterprets Sources
Even when AI pulls real sources, it misuses them. It doesn’t actually read research—it just pulls random references and forces them into the text without understanding their relevance.
For example, if you ask AI to write about the causes of World War I, it might cite:
“Smith, J. (2004). The Role of Economic Factors in 20th-Century Conflicts. Cambridge University Press.”
Sounds convincing. But if you check the actual book, it might not even mention World War I. AI guesses at relevance instead of using sources accurately.
Ghostwriters, on the other hand:
✅ Read and understand the sources before citing them.
✅ Ensure sources actually support the argument being made.
✅ Use direct quotes, paraphrasing, and proper attribution for credibility.
When professors read AI-generated essays, they often find that the sources don’t actually support the claims being made. That’s an instant red flag.
3. AI Fails at Citation Formatting
Even if AI somehow pulls a real source, it often formats the citation incorrectly. Since different academic disciplines use APA, MLA, Chicago, or Harvard referencing, precision is key—but AI consistently makes basic citation errors.
Common AI citation mistakes include:
❌ Incorrectly formatted author names (e.g., listing first name before last name).
❌ Inconsistent formatting within the same paper (e.g., mixing APA and MLA styles).
❌ Leaving out page numbers for direct quotes.
❌ Failing to include a proper reference list or bibliography.
Ghostwriters, on the other hand:
✅ Use proper academic formatting, tailored to the student’s university guidelines.
✅ Ensure every source is properly formatted, whether APA (author-date), MLA (in-text citation), or Chicago (footnotes).
✅ Cross-check all citations to ensure accuracy.
Professors immediately notice when citations are incorrect or inconsistent. AI-generated essays frequently botch referencing, making them instantly suspicious.
4. AI Can’t Conduct Original Research or Engage with Sources
AI doesn’t analyze sources—it just regurgitates information. In academic writing, engaging with sources critically is key. That means:
✅ Comparing and contrasting different viewpoints.
✅ Evaluating the credibility of sources.
✅ Integrating research smoothly into an argument.
AI fails at all of this. It simply lists information without explaining why certain sources matter.
For example, an AI-written essay might say:
“Historians have debated the causes of the Great Depression. Some argue that economic factors were most significant, while others believe political instability played a role.”
What’s missing? Names, sources, citations, and analysis. AI provides surface-level summaries but never engages with actual academic debate.
A ghostwriter, on the other hand, would write:
“Keynesian economists argue that the Great Depression was triggered by a collapse in aggregate demand, while monetarists such as Milton Friedman emphasize the role of Federal Reserve policy failures (Friedman & Schwartz, 1963). More recent scholars, including Eichengreen (1992), highlight the impact of the international gold standard in worsening the crisis.”
See the difference?
✅ Real academic engagement.
✅ Proper citations.
✅ Direct references to actual scholars and debates.
AI writing never goes beyond surface-level generalizations, making it instantly obvious to professors that the student hasn’t actually done any research.
The Bottom Line: AI is a Disaster for Research and Citations
AI-generated essays fail at academic research because they:
❌ Make up sources out of thin air.
❌ Misuse and misinterpret real sources.
❌ Format citations incorrectly, making them easy to flag.
❌ Fail to engage critically with academic debates.
In contrast, ghostwriters excel at research because they:
✅ Use real, peer-reviewed sources.
✅ Ensure sources are actually relevant to the argument.
✅ Properly format citations according to university standards.
✅ Critically analyze and engage with sources in a way AI never can.
This is why AI-generated essays are instantly suspicious to professors—and why ghostwriting remains the only real alternative for students who need high-quality, undetectable academic writing.
If an essay doesn’t have real research, real citations, and real analysis, it’s not a real academic paper—it’s garbage. And AI-generated essays?
They’re the worst kind of garbage.
V. The Art of Writing: Why Ghostwriters Will Always Win
At its core, writing isn’t just about putting words on a page—it’s about crafting a compelling, structured, and engaging argument. AI-generated essays fail because they lack intent, depth, and creativity. Meanwhile, human ghostwriters understand the art of writing—they bring originality, nuance, and strategic thinking to academic work.
This final section breaks down exactly why ghostwriters will always outperform AI and why students who want top-quality, undetectable essays will continue turning to human expertise.
1. Writing Isn’t Just Content—It’s Style, Persuasion, and Impact
AI-generated writing feels robotic, generic, and lifeless because AI doesn’t understand the art of language. A strong essay isn’t just about conveying information—it’s about:
✅ Crafting engaging introductions that hook the reader.
✅ Writing with rhythm and sentence variation to maintain interest.
✅ Building persuasive arguments that convince, rather than just inform.
AI-generated essays often sound like Wikipedia summaries, whereas a ghostwritten essay feels natural, dynamic, and compelling.
Example of an AI-generated introduction:
“The American Civil War was a conflict between the North and the South that lasted from 1861 to 1865. It was caused by disagreements over slavery, economic differences, and political tensions. The war had a significant impact on the United States.”
Example of a ghostwritten introduction:
“The American Civil War wasn’t just a battle between North and South—it was a clash of ideologies that would redefine the future of the United States. Fueled by deep economic divides, political fractures, and the moral crisis of slavery, this war wasn’t inevitable, but it was unavoidable. Understanding its causes isn’t just about history—it’s about recognizing the tensions that still shape American society today.”
See the difference?
✅ The ghostwritten version is engaging, vivid, and persuasive.
❌ The AI-generated version is dull, predictable, and uninspired.
This is why ghostwriters win—they write with intent, style, and persuasion, while AI simply dumps information.
2. Ghostwriters Understand Audience, Tone, and Adaptation
One of the biggest failures of AI writing is that it doesn’t adapt to different audiences. A skilled ghostwriter understands that a first-year college essay should sound different from a PhD dissertation. AI? It writes every essay in the same generic, lifeless tone.
Ghostwriters know how to tailor writing to:
✅ Match the student’s academic level (so it doesn’t raise suspicion).
✅ Adjust tone and complexity based on the professor’s expectations.
✅ Incorporate subject-specific jargon naturally.
For example, a political science ghostwriter understands how to integrate real-world examples, historical context, and ideological analysis into an essay. AI, on the other hand, simply spits out generic definitions and surface-level summaries.
That’s why AI-generated essays feel empty and out of place—they don’t fit the context, the professor’s expectations, or the student’s voice.
3. AI Detection is Getting Better—Ghostwriting Remains Undetectable
With universities cracking down on AI-generated work, the demand for human ghostwriting is higher than ever.
Here’s why AI is becoming a liability for students:
🚨 AI-detection software is catching students at record rates.
- Programs like Turnitin’s AI detector and GPTZero can identify AI-generated writing with increasing accuracy.
- False positives are also a problem—innocent students are getting flagged for AI usage, even when they write their own work.
🚨 Universities are implementing stricter anti-AI policies.
- Many schools now classify AI-generated work as plagiarism or academic misconduct.
- Some universities have expulsion policies for students caught submitting AI-written essays.
🚨 AI detection tools don’t just check for AI—they compare writing styles.
- If a student suddenly turns in an AI-generated paper that sounds nothing like their previous work, professors become suspicious.
Meanwhile, ghostwriting remains 100% undetectable because:
✅ It’s written from scratch, making every essay completely original.
✅ It can be adjusted to match the student’s writing style.
✅ It won’t trigger AI-detection tools, plagiarism checkers, or university software.
For students who want to avoid AI detection and guarantee quality, ghostwriting is the only real solution.
4. AI Writing Feels Fake—Ghostwriting Feels Authentic
Professors can tell when an essay lacks a human touch. AI writing feels bland, repetitive, and inauthentic, while a ghostwriter knows how to:
✅ Use rhetorical techniques to enhance argumentation.
✅ Create smooth, natural transitions between ideas.
✅ Write with personality, clarity, and precision.
Example of AI-generated text:
“The Industrial Revolution changed society in many ways. It led to the rise of new industries, urbanization, and economic growth. Many historians agree that the Industrial Revolution was an important historical event.”
Example of ghostwritten text:
“The Industrial Revolution wasn’t just a shift in economic production—it was a transformation that reshaped the fabric of society. From the birth of factory labor to the explosive growth of cities, this period marked a turning point that would forever alter the way humans lived, worked, and interacted with the world around them.”
AI feels flat.
Ghostwriting feels natural, engaging, and intelligent.
That’s the difference between randomly generated text and real academic writing crafted by a skilled professional.
The Bottom Line: AI Will Never Replace Human Writers
AI-generated essays fail because:
❌ They lack style, persuasion, and impact.
❌ They don’t adjust for audience, tone, or academic level.
❌ They are getting caught by AI-detection tools.
❌ They feel generic and fake, making them instantly suspicious.
Meanwhile, ghostwriters:
✅ Craft compelling, persuasive, and well-structured essays.
✅ Adapt writing to fit the student’s academic level and professor’s expectations.
✅ Remain 100% undetectable, even as AI detection improves.
✅ Produce authentic, high-quality writing that stands up to scrutiny.
AI-generated essays are garbage because AI doesn’t understand writing as an art. Professors can tell when an essay is robotic, vague, and poorly structured.
Ghostwriters don’t just survive in the AI era—they thrive. It’s no surprise that OpenAI and other LLM companies are facing a litany of lawsuits in 2025.
AI was supposed to replace human writers. Instead, it proved why real expertise will always be in demand. And with Unemployed Professors having 14 years serving students worldwide, it’s no surprise they produce the best custom academic writing.